Wednesday, 30 March 2016



Timmy is a very close friend of mine. We discuss Islamic spread and issues very often. Timmy is an atheist and very informed person. He read the article of Ahmadi Writer and Activist Tahir Nasser published at titled as “Why the Quran Protects Against Radicalization: A Rebuttal to USA Today’s Nabeel Qureshi”. You can read the article by Tahir Nasser here. Mainly his argument was that all the peaceful but abrogated verses are in fact not abrogated, they still can be applied because Ahmadya community does not believe in abrogation. Timmy decided to confront Tahir Nasser on the topic of most later violent verse in Quran 9.29(Command of Fight with non-believersJews and Christians) and its current application. In that effort he almost torn apart Tahir Nasser who responded to timmy’s comments abruptly. This discussion is very informative and I am Just going to reproduce here as it is. Then you can decide who is right and who is wrong.

Timmy: Sorry Mr. Later verses in Quran are the ones which are the later commands on some subject previous verses on that subject are considered abrogated. Later verse in Quran with regard to Non-believers, Jews and Christians is Quran 9.29 which calls for fight to them until they submit. Moderate Muslims like you play as front runners for the terrorist by Playing deception and showing appeasement to the West as ordered by Quran 3.28, If Quran calls for peace where are those people of Islam who have following in Millions to condemn and protest against terrorists. Your opinion only support terrorist by deceiving people into believing That Islam is peaceful while its not. Alazhar university believes that Muslims will establish a caliphate as per the ahadith of Muhammad and ISIS is working for that. If you condemn ISIS you Condemn the Institution of Islam Al azhar. Alazhar is authrity on Islam while you are not without any kind of Following. So your Islam is a deception and distorted version of True Islam.


Tahir Nassar : I think you have misunderstood me. I certainly (and no member of the Ahmadiyya community does) do not believe in the theory of abrogation - that later parts of the Qur'an nullify earlier parts. The apparent contradiction is because certain verses are applicable only within certain contexts. That a muslim must take all verses of the Qur'an and read them together is explained by the Qur'an itself in the following verse:
He it is Who has sent down to thee the Book; in it there are verses that are decisive in meaning — they are the basis of the Book — and there are others that are susceptible of different interpretations. But those in whose hearts is perversity pursue such thereof as are susceptible of different interpretations, seeking discord and seeking wrong interpretation of it. And none knows its right interpretation except Allah and those who are firmly grounded in knowledge; they say, ‘We believe in it; THE WHOLE IS FROM OUR LORD.’ — And none heed except those gifted with understanding. — (Qur'an 3:8)
The Qur'an itself denies the theory of abrogation several times:
Yet you are the people who slay your own brethren and turn out a section of your people from their homes, backing up one another against them with sin and transgression. And if they come to you as captives, you ransom them, while their very expulsion was unlawful for you. DO YOU THEN, BELIEVE IN PART OF THE BOOK AND DISBELIEVE IN PART? There is, therefore, no reward for such among you as do this, except disgrace in the present life; and on the Day of Judgment they shall be driven to a most severe chastisement; and surely, Allah is not unmindful of what you do. (Qur'an 2:86)
Behold, you are those who love them, but they love you not. And you believe in ALL the Book. When they meet you, they say, ‘We believe;’ but when they are alone, they bite their finger-tips at you for rage. Say, ‘Perish in your rage. Surely, Allah knows well what is hidden in your breasts.’ (3:120)
So how can we understand the verse 9:29? The verse 9:29 commanding Muslims to fight non Muslims must be understood in the context of other verses on fighting such as:
And fight them until there is no persecution, and religion is freely professed for Allah. But if they desist, then remember that no hostility is allowed except against the aggressors. (2:194)
The context of its revelation was that the Byzantine empire (a Christian empire) was rumoured to be amassing a force on the Syrian border to attack the Muslims. Against this, the Muslims amassed a force and rode to the border of the Syrian empire to meet the army. This article explains this all well:
As for the relationship between Muslims and non Muslims who do not persecute others for their faith (as the Byzantine empire was rumoured to be doing and ultimately did to the Muslims) the Qur'an is clear that it should be one of peace:
Allah forbids you not, respecting those who have not fought against you on account of your religion, and who have not driven you forth from your homes, that you be kind to them and act equitably towards them; surely Allah loves those who are equitable. (60:9)


Timmy : Whatever verse We abrogate or cause to be forgotten-We bring better than it or its like.(Quran2.106) 
First of all how 9.29 cannot be used now when terrorist think that Muslims are being persecuted so They have a right to fight ....
Secondly your community has a distorted version of Quran which mainstream Muslims reject. They consider you Kafir. You cannot say that your distorted version of Quran is followed by all Muslims so you Must say this in all of your articles to make people understand the threat rather you dont mention this fact and end up deceiving people. 
lastly you still provide cover for the terrorists by lying and deceiving the people about islam there are thousands ahadith about Jihad and implementation of Islam. By telling people that Islam is peaceful which is not you are just providing a cover to mainstream terrorist so that the world dont start a war on islam and in the meanwhile terrorist keep on implementing Islam in the west. You are as equal terrorist as the ISIS.


Tahir Nasser: Qur'an 2:106 is in relation to the statements of previous revelations like the Torah or the Gospel. This is obvious from the context of verse 106, insofar preceding verses are talking about the jealousy of Jews and Christians as regards the Qur'anic revelation.
This also cannot be referring to the Qur'anic verses, because Allah has given a promise that the Qur'anic verses will never be forgotten but protected from all change (Qur'an 15:9-10). So Allah is not referring to the Quranic verses as being abrogated or forgotten, but the teachings of previous religions, some of which are preserved in the Qur'an, others of which, which were specific to the Age and Geography of previous civilisations and are now no longer applicable, have been replaced with better, universal teachings of the Qur'an. Read this:®ion=E1&CR=EN,E2
The rest of your points aren't worth replying to. Have a good day.


Timmy : Tafsir Jalalyn of verse 2.106 for your defective knowledge ...

When the disbelievers began to deride the matter of abrogation, saying that one day Muhammad enjoins his Companions to one thing and then the next day he forbids it, God revealed: And whatever verse (mā is the conditional particle), that has been revealed containing a judgement, We abrogate, either together with its recital or not [that is only its judgement, but its recital continues]; there is a variant reading, nunsikh, meaning ‘[Whatever verse] We command you or Gabriel to abrogate’, or postpone, so that We do not reveal the judgement contained in it, and We withhold its recital or retain it in the Preserved Tablet; a variant reading [of nunsi’hā] is nunsihā, from ‘to forget’: so ‘[Whatever verse We abrogate] or We make you forget, that is, We erase from your heart’; the response to the conditional sentence [begun with mā] is: We bring [in place] a better, one that is more beneficial for [Our] servants, either because it is easier [to implement] or contains much reward; or the like of it, in terms of religious obligation and reward; do you not know that God has power over all things?, including abrogating and substituting [verses]? (the interrogative here is meant as an affirmative).
Tafsir Ibn Abbas on 2.106 ...
Then Allah mentions what was abrogated of the Qur'an and that which was not abrogated, as a direct reference to the claim of the Quraysh who said to the Prophet: O Muhammad! Why do you command us to do something and then forbid it, saying: (Such of Our revelations as We abrogate) We do not erase a verse that was acted upon before and which is now not acted upon (or cause to be forgotten) or leave unabrogated so that it is acted upon, (We bring one better) We send Gabriel with that which more profitable and easier to act upon (or the like) in reward, benefit and action. (Knowest thou not) O Muhammad (that Allah is Able to do all things?) of the abrogated and unabrogated.
Another verse of Quran 16.101..
When We replace a message with another -- and God knows best what He reveals -- they say: "You have made it up;" yet most of them do not know.
Tafsir Ibn Abbas...
(And when We put a revelation) when We send Gabriel with an abrogating verse (in place of (another) revelation) in place of another abrogated verse, (and Allah knoweth best what He revealeth) and Allah knows the probity of that with which He commands His servants, (they say) the disbelievers of Mecca say: (Lo! thou art but inventing) from yourself, O Muhammad. (Most of them know not) that Allah commands His servants with that which is good for them.
all of the above tafsirs of the verses i quoted prove that you are playing a deception and lying to people. All of the islamic books are filled with the rules of interpretation of Quran but you are just helping terrorist by cooling down the victims ...You are equaly terrorists.
Dont think the everybody is gonna buy your lies......Not everybody


Tahir Nasser: Yes indeed, there are Muslims who believe in the theory of abrogation but there is no good evidence for it.

All of the Tafasir that you have listed do indeed speak of abrogation. You know why? Because the Qur'an was revealed over a 23 year period. Not all its rules and instructions were revealed at the same time. At times, situations arose requiring guidance on issues the Prophet had not yet received revelation regarding. In these regards, he would give the commandment found in the Old Testament, while awaiting the new teaching of the Qur'an. This is why the Meccans said to him: "why do you give one teaching at one point and then God gives another later". Until the Qur'an gave a teaching on a matter, he would follow the instructions of Judaism.
However, once a verse of the Holy Qur'an was revealed, there was no question of its abrogation, otherwise its integrity as the "final law from God" would be put in jeopardy. Some Muslims have misunderstood the above issue, and so have construed it to mean that parts of the Qur'an abrogated other parts, since they could not reconcile the two instructions, being deficient in understanding of Islam and the Qur'anic teachings. An example of such is given in the following authentic hadith. The Prophet of Islam said:
"Thus were ruined those people who have gone before you, for they interpreted certain parts of their scriptures in such a manner as to make them contradict other parts" (Musnad).
There is another hadith in one companion of the Prophet directly refutes abrogation theory, saying that it derives from misunderstanding the commandments of God. I will find it and post it for you.


Timmy : No problem you can try very hard to find something against abrogation but let me quote you some ahadith how Companions of prophet used to apply abrogation increase your defective knowledge...
1)Abu al. 'Ala' b. al-Shikhkhir said:
The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) abrogated some of his commands by others, just as the Qur'an abrogates some part with the other.(Sahih Muslim 344,In-book reference : Book 3, Hadith 99,USC-MSA web (English) reference : Book 3, Hadith 675)
2) Narrated Nafi`:
Ibn `Umar recited: "They had a choice, either fast or feed a poor for every day.." and added, "This Verse is abrogated."(USC-MSA web (English) reference : Vol. 6, Book 60, Hadith 33,Arabic reference : Book 65, Hadith 4506)
3)Narrated Ibn 'Abbas:
The verse: "And say to the believing women that they should lower gaze was partly abrogated by the verse: "Such elderly women as are past the prospect of marriage." ( Sunan Abi Dawud 4111,
In-book reference : Book 34, Hadith 92,English translation : Book 33, Hadith 4099)
4) Narrated Marwan Al-Asghar:
A man from the companions of Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) who I think, was Ibn `Umar said, "The Verse:-- "Whether you show what is in your minds or conceal it...." was abrogated by the Verse following it."(sahih Bukhari SC-MSA web (English) reference : Vol. 6, Book 60, Hadith 69,Arabic reference : Book 65, Hadith 4546)
5) Ibn 'Abbas said:
The Qur'anic verse: "If they do come to thee, either judge between them, or decline to interfere" was abrogated by the verse: "So judge between them by what Allah hath revealed."(Sunan Abi Dawud 3590,In-book reference : Book 25, Hadith 20,English translation : Book 24, Hadith 3583)
and many more i can present OK ...Now let me conclude you are the corruption of Islam and the worst form of Taqiya (Quran 3.28), you are just tools of terrorist who use people like you to spread their agenda among western countries....another thing ahmdis can be counted on finger tips, they are so small in numbers. True Islam is the one the ISIS and Alazhar are following and preaching. You are the media, the advertisement agency to portray soft image of true form of terrorism of islam for making it acceptable for the people of the west. You are soft version of terrorists in fact you all are the same.
Not everyone is buying what you are selling my friend........not everyone......


Tahir Nasser: 1. The opinions of companions of the Prophet do not trump the Qur'anic statements that abrogation is false. There are statements by companions of the Prophet in which they had misunderstood certain points. Moreover, many hadith, especially deriving from Ibn Abbas, often do not originate from him but utilise his name and stature for authority.
This something that you don't seem to understand: hadith cannot overrule the Qur'an. When the Qur'an has stated that "this is a perfect book" and "there is no doubt in it" and it speaks against previous scriptures and their abrogation, as well as the Prophet himself warning against abrogation, the reported sayings of this companion or that companion of the Prophet of Islam have no say in the matter. There is a hierarchy of evidence in Islam. Abrogation has been demonstrated to be a product of poor understanding of the applicability of the Qur'anic text.
2. The translation of "abrogation" in the above hadith is erroneous. The word "abrogation" has been misapplied in the above examples. Abrogation means to nullify and cancel out. This does not apply in any of the above hadith. Certainly, certain parts of the Qur'an limit the application and scope of other parts - that is entirely admitted and that is exactly what we are saying occurs with verses of the Qur'an relating to fighting; they only apply once the conditions of war, set out in other verses, come into force.


Timmy:  I placed my reliance on Quranic verses 2.106, 16.101 and there explanation by Highly Credible sources like Tafseer Jalalyn , Ibn Abbad Plus i quoted Highly Credible Ahadith of the companions of Your prophet as compared to their view....Your opinion cannot be relied upon...In fact you have no Comparison with them. Your point of view is nothing but negation of Islamic teachings.....

based On them i rule out your distorted, Misconceived understanding of Islam. This discussion I did only for the sake of the people to understand the deception employed by the people like you. That's all from me, now its for the people to decide who to trust. I am done with your ignorance and distortion. My time is too precious to be wasted on ignorant like you. Bbye


Tahir Nasser: Qur'anic verses must be understood in line with other Qur'anic verses (see below). This is in keeping with what the Qur'an states about itself. No tafsir, hadith or scholarly interpretation can trump what the Qur'an states about ITSELF:
He it is Who has sent down to thee the Book; in it there are verses that are decisive in meaning — they are the basis of the Book — and there are others that are susceptible of different interpretations. But those in whose hearts is perversity pursue such thereof as are susceptible of different interpretations, seeking discord and seeking wrong interpretation of it. And none knows its right interpretation except Allah and those who are firmly grounded in knowledge; they say, ‘We believe in it; THE WHOLE IS FROM OUR LORD.’ — And none heed except those gifted with understanding. — (3:8-9)
Kind Regards


It’s little bit long but clearly exposes the lies and distorted version of Islam presented by Ahmadya Writer Tahir Nasser.  I agree with Timmy that so called moderate Muslims are the soft form of terrorists because Radical scholar get their man power from these moderate Muslims by showing them the clear commands of Jihad and violence in Quran. First you start to believe in Quran then they indoctrinate you with extremist ideology of Islam which is excessively available in Islamic books, pick any, including Quran and Hadith. Secondly these moderate Muslims keep on deceiving the west by telling them that terrorism has no link with Islam i n an effort to make it an acceptable religion for the west. Stay aware and safe from deceptive moderate Muslims.


Asad Mahmud

Monday, 28 March 2016



Recently Pakistani famous singer turned so called scholar of Islam became victim of the rage of Pakistani Muslims for his supposed remarks about beloved wife of the Prophet Muhammad, Aisha and women status in Quran in general. Some people at the airport slapped and beaten him ferociously. Watch the video.

I believe as he was a singer in the past and new to Islamic hypocrisy prevailing in the religious circles of Pakistan so he spoke a few truths about Islam, naively, which made him subject of the ridicule of Pakistani community. It happens with everyone whosoever reads Quran finds a lot of things contradictory to modern ethical values but believes that its literal word of Allah so he can preach it in Public. But Public has been brainwashed by the paid clerics into believing that Islam is limited to all the sugar coated stories preached in Juma prayer sermons, so they react ferociously to any negativity attributed to Quran, Hadith or their revered  religious personalities. What Junaid Jamshed said lets observe.

Junaid Jamshed supposedly made this blaspheming statement (at least to Muslims) with regard to beloved child bride of Prophet Muhammad, Aisha and I quote him, “Mother of Muslims, Aisha used to seek attention of Prophet Muhammad” further he narrated an incident cited in below mention hadith.

Narrated Al-Qasim bin Muhammad:
`Aisha, (complaining of headache) said, "Oh, my head"! Allah's Messenger said, "I wish that had happened while I was still living, for then I would ask Allah's Forgiveness for you and invoke Allah for you." Aisha said, "Wa thuklayah! By Allah, I think you want me to die; and If this should happen, you would spend the last part of the day sleeping with one of your wives!" The Prophet said, "Nay, I should say, 'Oh my head!' I felt like sending for Abu Bakr and his son, and appoint him as my successor lest some people claimed something or some others wished something, but then I said (to myself), 'Allah would not allow it to be otherwise, and the Muslims would prevent it to be otherwise".(Sahih Bukhari 5666, Book reference: Book 75, hadith 27, English reference: Vol.7, Book 70, hadith 570)

Junaid Jamshed was trying to tell that Aisha pretended to have a headache to seek affection of prophet Muhammad. Muhammad responded in the above mentioned way. Then Junaid added that Women cannot change so don’t try to change them.One of his comments was about status of women in Quran in general and he said “Allah did not want the name of any woman in Quran except Maryam, the mother of Jesus”.

I agree with Junaid Jamshed on his both statements to the extent of  being based on Quran and Hadith. Muhammad was a misogynistic man who elevated men to be in charge of women and allowed wife beating  (Quran 3.34), allowed four wives per Muslim Male (Quran4.3), considered evidence of woman half of a man (Quran 2.282), Allowed rape(Marriage) of prepubescent girls (Quran 65.4). Once Prophet Muhammad was passing by a woman and addressed to her in a very arrogant way as is evident from the narration to give her the “Good News” that women are deficient in Religion and Intellect.

“Narrated Abu Sa`id Al-Khudri:
Once Allah's Messenger went out to the Musalla (to offer the prayer) of `Id-al-Adha or Al-Fitr prayer. Then he passed by the women and said, "O women! Give alms, as I have seen that the majority of the dwellers of Hell-fire were you (women)." They asked, "Why is it so, O Allah's Messenger?" He replied, "You curse frequently and are ungrateful to your husbands. I have not seen anyone more deficient in intelligence and religion than you. A cautious sensible man could be led astray by some of you." The women asked, "O Allah's Messenger! What is deficient in our intelligence and religion?" He said, "Is not the evidence of two women equal to the witness of one man?" They replied in the affirmative. He said, "This is the deficiency in her intelligence. Isn't it true that a woman can neither pray nor fast during her menses?" The women replied in the affirmative. He said, "This is the deficiency in her religion."( Sahih Bukhari 304 , Book reference Book 6, Hadith 9 USC-MSA web (English) referenceVol. 1, Book 6, Hadith 301)

So this was it, Junaid Jamshed just naively mentioned this fact that Allah did not like the name of any woman except Maryam in Quran. When you start to read Muslims sources, you come to same conclusions as Most of the Muslim countries treat their women just see the examples of Saudia, Iran, Afghanistan, Indonesia or any Muslim country. In fact Women protection bill in Pakistan was opposed by religious body of Pakistan due to being contradictory to Islamic teachings of beating wives.

Now the amazing and worth noting thing is that because of the positive publicity of Islam, no one want to believe that these teachings are part of Islam or the people in the ancient times behaved juts like ordinary people of the present times. Mentioning this thing that Aisha sought attention of Prophet Muhammad is blaspheming now.  Telling the truth about God of Islam, that he is misogynist, is also blaspheming now. This is miracle of positive publicity of Islam which is mostly funded by Saudi Arab on international scale. The mullahs in the mosques portray these people as super humans and clean from any sin, sinful behavior, or having any physical desire. Above mentioned references from Quran and hadith are a clear evidence of the misogynistic behavior of Muhammad, and his creation Allah, towards women but irony of the Matter is Muslim women consider it the “Honoring of Women”. I am unable to derive any honor for women out of these references, I don’t know how Muslim women feel honored by all this misogynistic crap.
How much the positive publicity of Islam has affected the Muslims in general , you can asses from the backlash on Juniad Jamshed in Social Media. General Muslim perception is that Junaid Jamshed has expressed his own opinion rather than verifying the veracity of his claim about Allah and Quran.

Sadly enough to see that the same thing is being promoted in Western countries , fabricated stories, lies, misrepresentation of Islam, victim-hood of Muslims, Misguiding justifications,  are over whelming in the Media. After every horrible incident there are so called Muslims on the TV to assure you that its not Islam and CNN like media networks broadcast the interviews of perfectly fine Muslims feeling unsafe due to the back lash.

If Islam is not whats written in Quran or Hadith then what the hell Islam is. Islam is everything mentioned in Quran and hadith and not what any moderate or extremist Muslim do. Some follow Islam devoutly some don’t. Anyone’s  behaviour does not accumulate as a sheer proof of the true nature of Islam. Islam is everything mentioned in unabrogated verses of Quran and hadith. This is the problem, which is also rampant in west in reference to Islam only that whoever tries to speak truth about Islam, foolish western leftist people bash him with severe criticism without giving value to his any argument. A rant of Racist, bigot and Islmophobe is started to silence the critics of Islam. They don’t know when in power these Muslims would ultimately kill them first because of their support for homosexuals, women , no child brides, other Religion or dogs ( Sinister animal as per Islam) as  these demands are  against Sharia and Law of Islam.

Islamism is disease, get rid of it as soon as possible. Otherwise it brings only destruction wherever it goes. First it kills non-Muslims then Muslims kill each other because of not being true Muslims (Belonging to different sects). It happened in past, it is happening now, if not treated it will happen in future. In 1400 years of Islam, Islam has not changed a bit but the countries have who embraced it.

Asad Mahmud

Sunday, 27 March 2016



I just wanna say a few words about the reporting of CNN of a far right Belgian group how the presenter has called them racist. I have seen the full coverage wherein the CNN team are blaming the people who are just standing for their own country to protect it from terrorism, being negativity portrayed continuously by CNN. As if its some kind of crime now to show patriotism for your country as against the Islamic terrorism. Now a days patriotism is not seen as patriotism but it is portrayed as Racism, Bigotry, Neo-Nazi-ism. CNN also blamed these protesters for diverting the attention of the police from ongoing investigation of the terrorist attacks. Now patriotism is a crime. You have lost your voice people because you are so afraid of these titles like bigot, neo-nazi, Islamophobe, racist that you do not dare to stand for your own people. How much have you already lost in this war of civilization. You have already been pushed back. I don't know who are you waiting for to speak for you. No miracle is gonna happen. You will have to speak for yourself. No one is gonna stand for you. You will have to stand for your own-self.  Now its time that you start to think about it.
Watch the small clip that I found about CNN reporting which gives the glimpse of whole mindset of at least CNN team. They are not reporting but calling you Racist again and again. Full report is more revealing.

Asad Mahmud

Friday, 25 March 2016



There is a lot of Misrepresentation of Islam by the people who were never Muslims who never read anything from Quran and Hadith. They never lived among Muslims, they try to judge the Muslims based on psychology or what they assume about Islam.
Ex-Muslims like me, I lived in Pakistan, my family is still all Muslims, they still pray five times a day, me myself a victim of Muslim Persecution due to something I wrote in Pakistan, are criticised by people on leftist agenda of not speaking the truth about Islam.
In Pakistan wherever you go, you will only find the praise of Prophet Muhammad, Islam, Allah. But at the same time you will find, poverty, sectarianism, Ignorance, illiteracy, fake religious Sufis, corruption. Wahabis will not pray in Sunni Mosques, Sunni will not pray in Shia Mosques, Shias and Sunnis are enemies of each other. Everybody cares about money only. Human values are not considered on any level. In any government office you cannot go through the procedure unless you bribe the authorities. The political elite behave like Mughal Kings and Queens, totally disconnected from the masses and their miseries.
When I came to Ireland, I got my first interaction with Christians and Jews in real sense. I was taught since childhood that Jews and Christians were bad people, USA was a bad country, who was conspiring against Muslims on every level. Then we saw America, destroying Iraq for so called Nukes. Supplying the Taliban of Pakistan and ISIS with weapons as per some reports, which strengthened this belief that USA is enemy of Muslims. In Pakistan we have a firm belief that 9/11 was conspired by Jews as Most of the Jews were absent on the day of Attack from twin towers. We Pakistanis consider it also a plan of USA for waging war on Muslims. We have seen pictures of Usama Bin laden with US authorities, so we Pakistanis believe that it was a conspiracy planned by USA and Jews. We as Pakistanis don’t care about the Development Programmes Started by UN in our country because most of the time due to the massive corruption, the benefits of those programs never reach the masses. We as Pakistanis consider UN as a servant body of USA. We Pakistanis consider Quran, the literal word of God. This little detail to make you understand the general perception of USA and Jews in Pakistan.
My first interaction with Jews and Christians happened when I came to Ireland. I found them very kind people. Generally Christians and Jews are nice people with no judgmental attitudes towards Muslims. They don’t see Muslims as threat generally. This behaviour forced me to question the beliefs I had in my mind with regard to these people. We knew as Muslim Pakistanis that Christians and Jews are very sharp and cunning people whose only agenda is to put their hands on the Oil in the Middle east and destroy Muslim community. But here I was among Jews and Christian Feeling safe, fleeing the persecution of my fellow Muslims.
Another thing which baffled and amused me at the same time when I heard the saying of Jesus for the first time that,” Love thy enemy and pray for those who persecute you”. It was overwhelming, though I heard it through an online video. I never attended a church, I didn’t have any idea of Converting to Christianity, which I didn’t.
Now I thought to read my scriptures myself. Generally in Pakistan we, Pakistani Muslims don’t read the Quran with translation. We don’t read ahadith ourselves. We only rely on what the Imams of Mosques or the scholars on TV tell us about Islam and that is all praise of Islam and Prophet Muhammad.  But general behaviour of Infidels(Jews and Christians ) plus the saying of Jesus, full of love for Humanity forced me to read my scriptures and believe me, I could not believe what I read there.
I found a God, Allah who is inimical towards Jews and Christians. (Quran 9.29, 9.30, 5.51, 3.32) I had a concept of God who does not discriminate among people because He was blessing everyone with everything, no one was dying as a community just because they were not Muslims. So this concept of God was completely in Contrast with the God, I found in Quran. The Quranic God calls the Jews, apes and Pigs, which is beneath the stature of God itself. Qur’anic God, Allah claimed to convert Jews of Previous times into Pigs and Apes but, I thought, if Allah is so much against them, why he did not do the same now. If Allah is cursing Jews and Christians in Quran 9.30 and it was the Death Bed wish of Prophet Muhammad to destroy Jews and Christians then why Allah did not destroy them in fulfillment of Last wish of the beloved prophet. Why Jews and Christians are the most developed and civilized countries in the World. Why no Muslim country is advanced in Science and technology. Why Allah is supporting the western nations but not the Muslim nations While He, the Creator of the universes possesses all the Power in the Universe.
Answer to all of above Question is only one that Islam is a false religion. It is based on the hatred of Jews and Christians. Islam is all about Arab Supremacy. Islam was created to give Arabs an upper hand on all other nations. Arabs have supported and spread this ideology so much that now every Muslim believe the same which I used to believe i.e. hatred for Jews and Christians especially for Israel and USA. Common non-Arab Muslims are still treated like shit by Arabs. You can see that during this traumatic time when Syria is under siege by ISIS, Gulf States refused to take in any refugees. Islam is all about Giving Arabs an Upper Hand. It’s a false and created religion, a man made conspiracy to dominate the world.
Now a days people like me are blamed by the people on Leftist Agenda that we don’t represent true Islam. I can only say that Muslims can be civilized but Islam cannot. Islam is fascist, totalitarian ideology which in some cases also try to intervene in the disgustingly private and personal matters of Muslims like in Indonesia Islamic City Council banned the Female Flatulence. It’s also a political agenda disguised as religion to further the influence of Arabs in the world. People on the leftist agenda try to understand the problem of Jihad on the basis of assumptions and false theories of Psychology or poverty in the Muslim countries, which is totally wrong.
Let’s read a one excerpt from an articles to see what the people on the leftist agenda generally assume.
“And yet, more troubling is the response from Americans - particularly certain presidential candidates - that demonstrates a lack of understanding of what drives young men and women to jihad. It’s that same response that inadvertently serves as propaganda and as a recruitment tool for the same terrorist organizations carrying out attacks from Mali to Belgium.
All-out war against the Islamic State will not defeat terrorism; nor will the mistreatment of American Muslims. Instead, we must use tolerance, inclusivity and above all, institutional investment in the Middle East to our advantage in slowing recruitment efforts of terrorists and keeping the U.S. safe.” Article by Colin Wolfgang.
Mr Colin Wolfgang claims that he understands what is driving Muslim youth to engage in Jihad. Its not your response that is causing youth to join Jihadi Organizations. Attacks in Belgium were committed by Belgium born Muslims. Who were living an advanced life in a modern society, why would they indulge in jihad.  Jihadi Organizations had been working even before 9/11. They invite people to Jihad because Allah ordered in Quran to Wage War on infidels( Quran 9.29). Allah said in
Quran 4.95: “Not equal are those believers remaining [at home] - other than the disabled - and the mujahideen, [who strive and fight] in the cause of Allah with their wealth and their lives. Allah has preferred the mujahideen through their wealth and their lives over those who remain [behind], by degrees. And to both Allah has promised the best [reward]. But Allah has preferred the mujahideen over those who remain [behind] with a great reward”
Prophet Muhammad also ordered Muslims to hate infidels and wage war on them.
Abu Hurairah reported the Prophet as saying “He who dies without having fought or having felt fighting (against the infidels) to be his duty will die guilty of a kind of hypocrisy.” (Sunan Abu Dawood 2502, Book Reference: Book 15, hadith 26, English Reference: Book 14 hadith 2496)

Sahl bin Sa'd (May Allah be pleased with him) reported: Messenger of Allah said, "Were this world worth a wing of mosquito, He would not have given a drink of water to an infidel." (Al Tirmadi Book.1 hadith 477)
Narrated `Ali: When it was the day of the battle of Al-Ahzab (i.e. the clans), Allah's Messenger said, "O Allah! Fill their (i.e. the infidels') houses and graves with fire as they busied us so much that we did not perform the prayer (i.e. `Asr) till the sun set." (Sahih Bukhari 2931, Book Reference: Book 56, Hadith 144, English Reference: Vol.4, Book 52, hadith 182)
Now can anyone treat this kind of hatred found in the text of Islamic books and there are numerous for waging war and participation in Jihad along with those filled with incitement of hatred for Jews and Christians. If you want to treat and defeat this phenomenon of Jihad then you have to deal with this ideology. By being polite to Muslims and by supporting them financially you are only equipping the enemy with the sources to defeat you. You are destroying your own people, your own civilization. President Obama has funded Iran in Billions but Iran is continuously testing the Missiles in contravention of UN resolutions. Iran has captured US fishermen and celebrated it as a victory against USA. Leftist Block is wasting the tax money of their own people to prepare and equip the enemies of West with weapons and resources.
US need to assure people that Invasion of Iraq was not a religious war but at the same time they need to finance the scholars who are trying to expose the ideology of Islam. Defeat the ideology and get rid of the Phenomenon of Jihad. Expose the Real full of Hatred god of Islam if you want peace in the world. Invest your money at proper place instead of helping your own enemies as to the detriment of your own people.

Asad Mahmud

Thursday, 24 March 2016


Micheal O'Brien or as most of the people know him as Micheal Comemi, is a very dear friend and very pleasant personality. He owns this beautiful online news magazine, The Manchester Terrier, which is available at He is a magnificent writer himself. Due to his kindness I was able to write in his Magazine which I really appreciate. So far three of my articles have been published in The Manchester Terrier which I thought to combine in one blog post as Links to those article so that the readers of Exposing Islam could be directed to them easily.

I really appreciate and thank the readers of My blog for their love and appreciation of my writings. Its priceless.

Asad Mahmud


During the time when my blog "Exposing Islam" was under restriction by GOOGLE for two weeks, I started another blog with the help of my friend Timmy, with his account. In those two weeks I wrote six blog posts including the effect of Colonization of Moon on Muslims. In order to make it convenient for the readers of my blog, I thought to combine the links of those six blog posts at one place. Below mentioned are the six blog posts I wrote during days of restriction. For the sake of new readers, restriction was imposed by GOOGLE due to the protest of Muslims on my posts. Here are the blog posts.

By clicking on the title links you will be able to visit that specific blog post.Thank you for your love and appreciation which is indeed priceless.

Asad Mahmud